<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><id>tag:ukhousingcrash.blog.co.uk,2009-11-08:/</id><title>Tired of vested interests in housing</title><link rel="self" href="http://ukhousingcrash.blog.co.uk/feed/atom/posts/"/><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://UKHousingCrash.blog.co.uk/"/><generator version="1.0">MokoFeed</generator><updated>2009-11-08T22:58:11+01:00</updated><entry><id>tag:ukhousingcrash.blog.co.uk,2007-10-20:/2007/10/21/uk_house_prices_and_vested_interests~3169245/</id><title>UK House Prices and Vested Interests</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://UKHousingCrash.blog.co.uk/2007/10/21/uk_house_prices_and_vested_interests~3169245/"/><author><name>notavestedinterest</name></author><published>2007-10-21T00:51:23+02:00</published><updated>2007-10-21T00:51:23+02:00</updated><content type="html">	&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Circulating numbers?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;Does anyone know the best way to circulate some basic numbers to as many people as possible? I would like to put some data out there that makes a nonsense of what vested interest economists and the like put out during their press releases i.e. why the housing market cannot worsen. &lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;There are some financial ratios for Japan that were worse than the UK, but the trends and levels of the numbers below, I hope speak for themselves....&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;Population density (persons per square km) in the UK is around 250 and that of Japan is 339. The population there was still growing in 1990…the year in which house prices started falling for the next 15 years—they added more people than we have over their boom period. (n.b. Japan has even less workable land because of earthquake zones and mountains.)&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;Unemployment in Japan in 1990 was around 3% (much lower than ours currently), while short term interest rates (higher than policy rates) were at close to current UK levels. &lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;UK	UK&lt;br&gt;
Year	Population&lt;br&gt;
1990	57.27m&lt;br&gt;
1995	57.96m&lt;br&gt;
2000	58.87m&lt;br&gt;
2005	60.24m&lt;br&gt;
2010	61.52m&lt;br&gt;
Source: United Nations.&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;Japan	Japan&lt;br&gt;
Year	Population&lt;br&gt;
1980	116.81m&lt;br&gt;
1985	120.84m&lt;br&gt;
1990	123.54m&lt;br&gt;
1995	125.47m&lt;br&gt;
2000	127.03m&lt;br&gt;
2005	127.90m&lt;br&gt;
2010	127.76m&lt;br&gt;
Source: United Nations.&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;Japanese money market rates&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;1987	4.2&lt;br&gt;
1988	4.5&lt;br&gt;
1989	5.4&lt;br&gt;
1990	7.7&lt;br&gt;
1991	7.4&lt;br&gt;
1992	4.5&lt;br&gt;
1993	3.0&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;UK inter-bank lending rate&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;Jun-03	3.57&lt;br&gt;
Sep-03	3.5&lt;br&gt;
Dec-03	3.86&lt;br&gt;
Mar-04	4.11&lt;br&gt;
Jun-04	4.51&lt;br&gt;
Sep-04	4.85&lt;br&gt;
Dec-04	4.82&lt;br&gt;
Mar-05	4.85&lt;br&gt;
Jun-05	4.83&lt;br&gt;
Sep-05	4.55&lt;br&gt;
Dec-05	4.56&lt;br&gt;
Mar-06	4.53&lt;br&gt;
Jun-06	4.64&lt;br&gt;
Sep-06	4.85&lt;br&gt;
Dec-06	5.17&lt;br&gt;
Mar-07	5.49&lt;br&gt;
Jun-07	5.72&lt;br&gt;
Sep-07	6.29&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;Hong Kong has a population density of 6,407 and Singapore 6,369 (Singapore in particular has traditionally had large numbers of foreign workers entering). They both saw a decade of price falls, although unlike Japan this was more related to the Asian financial crisis of 1997-98 (but population density did not provide a guaranteed rise in house prices as many would suggest is the case in the UK).&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;Current US and UK data:&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;US official rates:	4.75%&lt;br&gt;
UK official rates:	5.75%&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;US unemployment rate:	4.7%&lt;br&gt;
UK unemployment rate:	5.4%&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;The US, in other words, has lower interest rates and lower unemployment, but look at what is happening there. &lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;p.s. I should add that in my opinion this housing market is a giant liquidity driven Ponzi scheme. Of course each country is unique (there were other things going on in Japan’s case up to 1990, for example, but the point is that the arguments (immigration; population growth, lack of land for housing, low unemployment and low interest rates)) being used by housing bulls failed to help any of the other countries when bubbles came to bursting and liquidity declined. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;small&gt; &lt;a href="http://UKHousingCrash.blog.co.uk/2007/10/21/uk_house_prices_and_vested_interests~3169245/#comments"&gt;Comments&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/small&gt; &lt;/p&gt;</content></entry></feed>
